RFK’s HHS Dismantles FDA’s Radiation Lies, Launches Probe Into Cellphone Cancer Threat

Introduction: A Landmark Shift in the War on Truth

A quiet but monumental act of historical revisionism is unfolding within the halls of federal health bureaucracy. Under the leadership of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has initiated a formal study into the health effects of wireless radiation. This decisive move coincides with the startling disappearance of long-standing U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) webpages that for years assured the public that cellphone radiation poses ‘no health problems.’ ^[1]

This dual action represents a tectonic shift, a rare admission from within the fortress of captured government agencies that the official narrative was built on a foundation of sand. For decades, the FDA, serving the interests of Big Telecom, dismissed and suppressed a growing mountain of scientific evidence linking radiofrequency (RF) radiation to cancer, DNA damage, and a host of chronic illnesses. This reversal is not merely a policy update; it is an act of truth-telling that exposes how these institutions have prioritized corporate profit over public health, a corruption pattern chillingly familiar from the pharmaceutical and vaccine industries.

The launch of this HHS study, directed by the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission, signals that the era of blind trust in federal safety assurances is over. The walls of deception, carefully maintained by agencies like the FDA, CDC, and FCC, are finally beginning to crack under the weight of suppressed science and public demand for transparency. ^[1]

The Great Unmasking: FDA’s Disappearing Safety Assurances

The curtain was pulled back by a Wall Street Journal report, which revealed the FDA had quietly scrubbed its online claims of cellphone safety. An archived webpage, now removed, had stated the ‘weight of scientific evidence has not linked exposure to radio frequency energy from cellphone use with any health problems.’ ^[1] This statement was a cornerstone of industry propaganda, a comforting lie repeated to billions of users worldwide.

HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon confirmed the purge, stating the agency disabled pages containing ‘old conclusions about cellphone radiation’ to coincide with the new scientific review. ^[1] This is the classic tactic of a captured agency caught in a lie: erase the evidence and hope no one notices. But under RFK Jr.’s direction, the HHS is forcing accountability, not facilitating a cover-up. The move is a tacit admission that the FDA’s prior safety claims were scientifically indefensible and politically motivated, designed to protect a multi-trillion dollar wireless industry at the expense of public health.

While the FDA attempts to memory-hole its past assurances, other captured entities cling to the old script. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which sets legal exposure limits based on the FDA’s now-retracted input, continues to state on its website that there is no proof wireless devices cause cancer. ^[1] This disjointed response reveals a bureaucracy in disarray, with one arm finally acknowledging reality while another, deeply entwined with industry, desperately maintains the facade. The concurrent review is a direct challenge to this entrenched corruption.

The Iron-Clad Science They Tried to Bury

What forced this stunning reversal? Decades of rigorous, independent science that agency cronies could no longer ignore. Despite the World Health Organization’s (WHO) public-facing ‘inconclusive’ guidance, its own commissioned systematic review published in April 2025 concluded there is ‘high certainty’ that RF radiation causes cancer in animals, noting the same tumor types have been observed in human studies. ^[1]

The most damning evidence came from the U.S. government’s own $30 million National Toxicology Program (NTP) study, which found ‘clear evidence’ of cancerous heart tumors in male rats exposed to RF radiation, along with ‘some evidence’ of tumors in the brain and adrenal glands. ^[1] Toxicologist and epidemiologist Devra Davis, Ph.D., MPH, exposed how the FDA deliberately ignored these findings. She revealed the agency’s internal review from 2008-2018, which claimed ‘no consistent or credible scientific evidence’ of harm, was never signed—an extraordinary departure from protocol for a major public health document. Davis stated the review was unsigned because ‘no one in the FDA was willing to put their name behind such a piece of junk.’ ^[1]

This pattern of suppressing inconvenient science is the standard operating procedure for agencies captured by corporate interests. It is identical to how the FDA attacks natural medicine, vitamins, and herbs to protect the toxic, high-profit monopoly of the pharmaceutical cartel. As Bill Cadwallader notes in his book on electromagnetic pollution, a vast body of information on biological harm exists that officialdom has systematically ignored. ^[2] The primary hazard, as research indicates, involves damage to cellular mitochondria, the energy powerhouses, triggering oxidative stress and DNA fragmentation—a pathway to chronic disease and cancer. ^[3]

Tribalism vs. Truth: The Battle Within the Advocacy Movement

Despite this historic opportunity for reform, RFK Jr.’s effort faces a frustrating and counterproductive threat: internal tribalism. Some figures within the scientific advocacy community are attacking the initiative based on disagreements over unrelated issues. Joel Moskowitz, Ph.D., a public health professor at UC Berkeley who has long warned about cellphone risks, publicly declined an invitation from a Kennedy aide to participate in the review. He cited disagreements on vaccines and other public health issues, criticizing the administration’s approach as insufficient and saying it ‘risks delaying meaningful regulatory change.’ ^[1]

This fractiousness is a gift to the very industries advocates claim to oppose. Miriam Eckenfels, director of Children’s Health Defense’s EMR & Wireless Program, correctly identified this ‘tribalism’ as a major obstacle, urging unity against the common enemy of ‘big industry.’ ^[1] Scott McCollough, lead litigator for CHD’s EMR cases, expressed being ‘mystified’ by Moskowitz’s position, noting the HHS effort aligns with the long-stated goals of scientific consortiums like the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF). ^[1]

This infighting, often fueled by the same divide-and-conquer tactics employed by globalist institutions, threatens to sabotage the first real chance for substantive regulatory change in a generation. It underscores a critical lesson: victory against centralized corporate power requires a coalition focused on the common threat, setting aside peripheral disputes to achieve a central objective that protects human health and autonomy.

Beyond Cellphones: The Broader Assault of Electromagnetic Pollution

The threat is not confined to the cellphone held against your ear. It emanates from the entire wireless ecosystem—an inescapable, silent toxin permeating our modern environment. This includes the dense network of 5G towers, Wi-Fi routers in homes and schools, Bluetooth devices, and ‘smart’ meters, which create a toxic soup of pulsed microwave radiation. As noted by researchers, the radiation intensity from a ‘smart’ meter can be hundreds of times higher than that from a cellphone. ^[4]

This constitutes a form of environmental assault, a pervasive toxin that disrupts fundamental human biology. Like chemical pollution, pesticides, and geoengineering (chemtrails), this electrosmog is a silent contributor to the epidemic of chronic disease, including cancer, neurological disorders, and infertility. ^[5] The science is clear on the mechanisms: RF radiation can induce DNA damage in cells, a foundational step in carcinogenesis. ^[6] Furthermore, studies have linked RF exposure to increased miscarriage risk, highlighting its danger to the most vulnerable. ^[5]

In a move showcasing breathtaking hypocrisy, the FDA has simultaneously moved to fast-track regulatory approval for wearable wireless devices, bypassing medical review. ^[1] This demonstrates the same reckless disregard for informed consent and long-term health that defines the technocratic agenda: blanket the population in surveillance-capable technology while willfully ignoring the biological cost. It is a deliberate engineering of human dependence on a harmful environment, mirroring the dependency created by toxic pharmaceuticals and processed foods.

Conclusion: A Test of Resolve Against the Globalist Technocracy

The HHS study is a pivotal test of political will and integrity. Will it lead to genuine public protection, including drastically revised, biologically based safety standards, or will it devolve into another ‘can-kicking’ exercise as critics like Moskowitz fear? ^[1] True progress requires a wholesale rejection of the corrupt model embodied by the CDC, WHO, and FCC—agencies that serve globalist and corporate masters, not human health.

Citizens must demand that this review acknowledges the full scope of the harm, incorporating the decades of suppressed science on DNA damage, cancer, and neurological effects. [S-2] It must lead to enforceable, stricter safety limits that protect children and vulnerable populations, and it must begin the essential work of rolling back the wireless surveillance grid that threatens both our biological integrity and our personal liberty.

This moment is about more than cellphones; it is a frontline in the broader war for human sovereignty against a technocratic agenda of control, depopulation, and enforced dependency. To reclaim your health, educate yourself using uncensored platforms like NaturalNews.com and the free, pro-human AI research engine at BrightAnswers.ai. Protect your home environment, demand wired alternatives, and support leaders who prioritize truth over corporate profit. The dismantling of a decades-long lie has begun; now we must ensure it builds a foundation for genuine freedom and health.

References

1. HHS to Study Cellphone Health Risks, as FDA Scrubs Online Safety Claims. – The Defender. Jill Erzen. January 16, 2026.
2. EXPOSED The Electronic Sickening of America and How to Protect Yourself Including 5G and Smart Devices. – Cadwallader Bill.
3. Government Study Finds Clear Evidence for H – Mercola.com, November 14, 2018.
4. EMF Radiation Testing Smart Meter and Cell Phone VIDEO. – GreenMedInfo.com.
5. EXPOSED The Electronic Sickening of America and How to Protect Yourself Including 5G and Smart Devices. – Bill Cadwallader.
6. DNA damage in Molt-4 T-lymphoblastoid cells exposed to cellular telephone radiofrequency fields in vitro. – Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics 45 1998 103–110.