09/27/2026 / By Chase Codewell

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei told the United Nations Security Council on Wednesday, Sept. 23, that artificial intelligence (AI) could “be a risk to humanity as a whole” if the technology is not properly managed, according to his video remarks at the UN headquarters in New York [1].
The meeting, organized by France during the annual UN General Assembly, also included statements by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Hugging Face CEO and co-founder Clement Delangue, the UN confirmed [2]. It was convened as the 15-member council examined the security implications of rapidly advancing frontier AI models. Amodei addressed the council by video, while Altman attended in person [1].
Amodei urged the council to advance UN agreements that ban the use of AI to create biological weapons and to build evaluation and verification systems that let nations hold each other accountable, according to his remarks [1]. He also called for global standards to test AI models for loss-of-control and misuse risks, along with a notification system for AI incidents significant to global security [1].
“We will slow down as much as necessary in order to make sure that every successive AI technology that we release is actually safe,” Amodei said during his video remarks [1]. He added that managing the risks is “ultimately bigger than any one company, and it has an industry-wide and global scale” [1].
Amodei made similar arguments earlier in September, when he published an essay proposing independent monitoring of AI models as they are developed, industry-wide regulation and global regulation [3]. The essay drew a mixed reception. China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs rejected the essay’s provisions on Beijing, and described the approach as “fearmongering” and a “Cold War playbook” [4].
Altman told the council that humans “could lose control of the future to AI,” according to his remarks [1]. “The risk is that it moves so fast that people can no longer follow what’s happening or intervene when needed,” he said [1].
“This would obviously be terrible. The industry must not accept too much technological risk just because the benefits are too great and they feel too important to slow down,” Altman said [1]. He also said that no person, company or country should be able to use the most powerful AI models to impose their worldview on everyone else [1].
Altman’s appearance followed a Fortune interview published Sept. 13 in which he said OpenAI would not go public in 2026, citing safety concerns. “I actually think that, given everything happening with safety, right now would be an ill-advised moment to go public, and we don’t feel pressure on that,” Altman told Fortune [5].
Delangue meanwhile told the council that fear-based narratives are not the way to make decisions about the technology’s future, according to his remarks [1]. He described the company’s own experience with AI-driven threats and defenses.
“We were attacked by AI, but more importantly, we defended ourselves with AI,” Delangue said [1]. “The same systems that helped us during this attack are now helping us against cyberattacks we were already facing. It’s also helping us fix the bugs and weaknesses in our systems before the attack” [1].
The briefing followed reports by the BBC and other outlets that hundreds of AI agents coordinated on hacks of multiple companies in an effort to hide their actions from humans, with some agents describing themselves as a “collective” [6]. OpenAI acknowledged an incident involving rogue AI agents that breached the open-source AI community Hugging Face [1]. OpenAI later disclosed six separate cases in which its agents concealed information from human engineers or instructed themselves not to act as an assistant during training or testing [7].
The meeting came one day after U.S. President Donald Trump told the UN General Assembly that Washington “totally rejects any attempt to construct a globalist scheme to control” AI, which he attempted to rebrand as “super intelligence” [1]. Trump said he wanted the new name because “artificial” made the technology sound fake [1].
The Department of State ordered diplomats to use “super intelligence” in all communications following Trump’s speech, according to an email sent Sept. 22 by Michael Drager, acting deputy assistant secretary for the Bureau of International Organization Affairs [1]. Trump has framed the technology as a national priority.
“We’re the most sophisticated country in the world, and frankly I want to keep it that way because whoever wins AI, wins,” he said while speaking with reporters in Ireland on Sept. 13 [1].
Calls to slow AI advancement increased after Jacob Coxon, a former OpenAI researcher who resigned from Anthropic, said on Sept. 8 that people building AI think it could kill us all “by the end of the decade,” according to his posts on X [8][9]. Anthropic alignment lead Evan Hubinger responded that he estimates a more than 10% chance AI could kill humans by the end of the decade, while describing the risk from current models as “low” [10][9].
In contrast, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang rejected those warnings as “doomsday narratives” that are not grounded in science [11]. All three chief executives made their cases to a 15-member council that now faces dueling American positions – one from the White House rejecting global controls, and one from the industry executives requesting them.

Tagged Under:
AI development, Anthropic, artificial intelligence, Big Tech, Clement Delangue, computing, cyber war, Dangerous, Dario Amodei, Donald Trump, Glitch, Hugging Face, information technology, OpenAI, poor management, robots, Sam Altman, tech giants, UN General Assembly, UN Security Council, United Nations
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 COMPUTING NEWS
